第23章 《佃農理論》英語原著 (17)
[12].Young,Travels,Dublinedition,pp.241-42.Youngofferedlittleanalysistosupporthisclaims,andonedoubtshisimpartialitywhenhestated:"Themetayersweresomiserablypoor,itwasimpossibleforthemtocultivatewell.Istartedsomeobservationsonthemodeswhichoughttobepursued;butallconversationofthatsortistimelostinFrance"(Maxwelledition,pp.202-3).
[13].Young,Travels,Betham-Edwardsedition.
[14].Ibid.,p.18.
[15].Young,Travels,Maxwelledition,pp.361-404.
[16].WhenBetham-EdwardswroteinherintroductiontoYoung'sTravels(p.vi),that"nothinghasdonemore[thanmetayage]toimprovetheconditionofthepeasantandofhusbandrywithinthelastfiftyyears,"shewasnotspeakingofFrenchagricultureatYoung'stime.Thus,Maxwell'seditingmethodappearsmoreappropriate.Maxwell'sopiniononmetayageisworthnoting:
Itwasnotperhapssomuchacauseofpovertyhoweverasaresult,andthatitwasasystemthatworkedratherbetterinpracticethanintheoryisshownbythefactthatitsurvivedtheRevolution,andisstillarecognizedformofland-holding……EvenbeforetheRevolutionthereweremanyFrenchlandlordswholivedonexcellenttermswiththeirmetayers,visitingthemintheirholdingsanddiscussingagriculturalmatterswiththem(Maxwelledition,p.xxx).
[17].SeeYoung,Travels,Dublinedition,p.239.
[18].Young'saccountoftaxesisbestseeninachapterontheRevolution(Travels,Maxwelledition,pp.327-60).Onp.xxvi,Maxwellnoted:"Accordingtorecentestimates36percentofthepeasant'sinedisappearedindirecttaxestotheState;14percentwentontithespayabletotheChurch;while11or12percentwasconsumedbyseigneurialduesatYoung'stime."
[19].Seeibid.,pp.296-97.
[20].RichardJones,AnEssayontheDistributionofWealthandontheSourcesofTaxation,part1—Rent(London:JohnMurrary,1831).Tomyknowledge,noPart2waseverissued.ThatJonessharedSmith'sviewoflandleasedevelopmentisevidentthroughouttheentirevolume,andesp.onpp.73-75.
[21].Ibid.,p.91.
[22].Ibid.,pp.98-99.
[23].Ibid.,p.102.
[24].J.C.L.SimondedeSismondi,PoliticalEconomy[1815](NewYork:AugustusM.Kelley,1966),pp.41-42.
[25].SeeJohnStuartMill,PrinciplesofPoliticalEconomy(4thed.;London:JohnW.ParkerandSon,1857),Book2,chap.8,"OfMetayers."
[26].Ibid.,p.367.J.R.McCullochwasanothernoted"Englishauthority"whowrote:
Thepracticeoflettinglandsbyproportionalrents……isverygeneralonthecontinent;andwhereverithasbeenadopted,ithasputastoptoallimprovements,andhasreducedthecultivatorstothemostabjectpoverty[PrinciplesofPoliticalEconomy(Edinburgh,1843),p.471].
[27].Mill,PrinciplesofPoliticalEconomy,p.380.
[28].Ibid.,pp.366-67.
[29].Ibid.,p.367.
[30].Ibid.,pp.365-66.
[31].NotethatthelaststatementinthisquotationisquitedifferentfromJones'sview.
[32].SeeMill,PrinciplesofPoliticalEconomy,p.363andthesecondfootnoteonp.364.
[33].Ibid.,p.363.
[34].Ibid.,p.364.
[35].MillquotesSismondiinibid.,pp.363-64.
[36].Thisisdrawnfrommyimpressionoftheirdiscussionofdistribution.See,forexample,Jones,DistributionofWealth;Sismondi,PoliticalEconomy,chap.3;McCulloch,PrinciplesofPoliticalEconomy,pt.3;andMill,PrinciplesofPoliticalEconomy,bk.2.
[37].Mill,PrinciplesofPoliticalEconomy,pp.380-81.
B.TheNeoclassicalView
Severalanalyticaldeficienciesstoodinthewayofclassicalwritersinarrivingatageneralsolutionforresourceuseundersharetenancy.Otherthantheirconceptualambiguitiesmentionedearlier,classicalwritersfailedtotreatlandrentaspartofproductioncost.[1]Furthermore,themarginalanalysisrequiredtoreachanequilibriumwasvague.TheseshortingsdidnothandicapAlfredMarshallwhenheanalyzedsharecropping.Butwhereas,beforeMarshall,SismondiandMillhadnotplacedmuchweightonthetax-equivalentargument,Marshallrenewedthethesis,presumablybecausetheanalogytoataxundersharerentfitsratherneatlyintohismarginalanalysis.[2]Evenwithsuchanapproach,Marshallalmostobtainedthecorrectsolutioninafootnote.
BytracingfootnotesintwochaptersofMarshall'sPrinciples,40onederivesadiagramusedbyseveralsubsequenteconomists.Withfullerexposition,thisispresentedinfigure4.Forsimplicity,letusassumethattheonlytenantinputislabor.Infigure4,tenantlabor,t,ismeasuredalongthehorizontalaxis,and
representsthemarginalproductoftenantlaborwithagivenplotofland.Themarginaltenantcost,
,ishorizontalinapetitivemarket,withWastheprevailingwagerate.Ifthelandowneristohirefarmhandstodothetilling,equilibriumisatB,andthequantityoffarmlaborhiredwillbet2.Atthisequilibrium,wehavethemarginalequality:
=.
Thesameresultobtainsforownercultivation,whethertheownerworksuptot2andworkselsewhere,orwhetherheworkstolessthant2andhiresadditionallaborersatW.ThetotalrentasareturntolandreceivedbythelandownerisrepresentedbytheareaMDB,anamountequaltothatofafixed-rentcontract.
Underthetaxapproachofanalyzingsharetenancy,however,themarginaltenantreceiptnetofrent,
(1-r),willshiftdownwardateverypoint.Thatis,ifthelandownertakes[3]percentoftheannualyield(r=0.4)andthetenanttakes60percent,
(1-r)willbe60percentof
ateverypoint.Withthetenant'sdecisionmadeatthemargin,itissaid,equilibriumisatA,wherethemarginaltenantcostequalsthemarginaltenantreceipt;thatis,
=
(1-r).Theassociatedquantityoftenantlaborwillbet1.Underthiscondition,thetotalproductisrepresentedbytheareaODJt1,withthelandownergettingarentequaltoareaEDJAandthetenant'sshareequalingOEAt1.Asshown,areaMEArepresentstheamountreceivedbytheten-antoverandabovehisalternativeearning(areaOMAt1).WithequilibriumatA,themarginalproductoftenantlaborishigherthanthemarginaltenantcost.Sharetenancyisthereforeinefficient(withareaJABrepresentingtheeconomicwaste).
ItwaswiththisanalysisinmindthatMarshallmented: