第16章 《佃農理論》英語原著 (10)
Undermutualagreements,economictheoryimpliesthatthetotalamountoftenantinputscontractedwillbetheamountwhichyieldsthehighest(q-f)/h,orwhichyieldsthehighestrentperunitofland.Sinceinfigure3themarginalfarmingcostalwaysequalszero,thehighestvalueof(q-f)/hcanbederivedasfollows.Foreveryupwardshiftoff/hasaresultofincreasingthestipulatedamountoftenantinput,thereisassociatedanupwardshiftofq/h.Theformerrepresentsthemarginalnonlandcost,whichincreasesataconstantrate(i.e.,constantmarginalfactorcostunderpurepetition);thelatterrepresentsthemarginalproductivityofadditionaltenant(i.e.,nonland)input,whichincreasesatadecreasingrate(i.e.,decreasingmarginalproductoftenantinput).[3]Thehighest(q-f)/h-associatedwithaspecificf/hcurve-isobtainedwhenthemarginalupwardshiftsoff/handq/hareequal,orwhenthemarginalproductoftenantinputequalsthemarginaltenantcost.Theassociatednonlandfarmingcost,whichdefinesf/h,coverstheleveloftenantinputsconsistentwithproductiveequilibrium.Tomaximizewealth,thecropschosentobeplantedorrotated,andthemethodofproduc-ingthem,are,bydefinition,thosewhichyieldthehighestpresentvalueoflandtothelandowner,thatis,whichmaximizerentalannuity.[4]Therelevantvalueof(q-f)/h,oraveragerent,fordecisionmakingisthusthehighestonederivedfromalternativepairsofq/handf/h.Tostateitmoreprecisely,thehighestvalueof(q-f)/hdefinesthecostoflandperacreasafactorofproduction.[5]
Themarginalproductofland,
—or
infigure2—cutsq/hand(q-f)/hattheirhighestpoints.Theequilibriumlandsizeassignedtothistenant,T1,iswhere(q-f)/hisatamaximum.Maximizingrentperacreoflandwillmaximizetherentalannuityfromthelandlord'stotallandholdings.Withtheequilibriumtenantlandsizedetermined(T1),theequilibriumrentalpercentageequals(q-f)/hdividedbyq/h(atT下標內容).Thatis,therentalpercentage,r,equalsar/apaslabeledinfigure3.Giventhisequilibriumpercentage,say70percent,weplotthemarginalcontractrentcurve,
r,asthispercentageof
ateverypoint.
Sincethetenantcontractstopayapercentageofthetotalproduct,asindicatedby
r,thecostoflandisnolongeraconstraintwithrespecttotheamountoflandthetenantwilluse.Tomaximizehisine,thetenantpreferstoemploylandtothepointwhere
iszero(whileholdinghisfarminginputsconstantascontractuallystipulated).Thelandowner,ontheotherhand,willlimitthetenant'sholdingtoT1,andparceltheremainderofhistotalholdingtoothertenantsundersimilarcontractualarrangements.[6]ThelandownercannotsuccessfullyrestrictlandsizetolessthanT1,sincewithrentalpercentagerthetenant'salternativeearningwillbehigherelsewhereandhewillgiveupthetenancy.
Severaladditionalremarkscanbemade.First,notalltenantfamiliesareequallyproductive.Somewillbeabletoproducemorebecauseoftheirendowmentsofcertain"specific"factorsofproduction,forexample,varyingamountsofknowledge.Inpetitiveequilibrium,themoreproductivetenantswillbetheintramarginaltenants,andthef/hcurvethusdefinedwillincludetheimputedrentforthetenant.Thelandownerscannotsuccess-fullydiscriminateamongtenantsofvaryingefficiencieseveniftherearenocostsassociatedwithdiscrimination,becauseland-lordsemployingmarginaltenants(leastproductivetenants)willbidthemoreproductivetenantsawayfromadiscriminatinglandlord.
Second,eveniflandishomogeneous,thelandsizepertenantfarmmaynotbethesame.Defininghomogeneouslandaslandphysicallyidenticalandhavingthesamerentalvalueperunit-thatis,the(q-f)/hcurvesindifferenttenantfarmsyieldequalheightsattheirpeaks-thelandsizesfordifferenttenantswilldifferiftheproductionfunctionsofthesetenantsdiffer.[7]Thisalsoimpliesthattherentalpercentagefordifferenttenantfarmsmaynotbethesame.Thatis,inmaximizingtherentalannuityofhislandholdings,theownerwillassigndifferentlandsizesandchargedifferentrentalpercentagestodifferenttenantsiftheirproductionfunctionsrequiredifferentintensitiesoftenantinputs.Inequilibrium,givenhomogeneouslands,themarginalproductivityoflandforeachfarmmustbeequalateverymargin,foritisatthehighestvalueof(q-f)/hthatlandsizesaredivided.
Third,thefarmingcost(otherthanthecostofland)maybesharedbythetenantandthelandownerjointly.Inthiscase,thef/hcurverepresentsthebinedcost.Givenq/handf/hasinfigure3,thef/hminusthelandowner'sinputcostwillbelower,thusdefiningahigher(q-df)*/hcurve.Thishigher(q-f)*/hcurve(notdrawn)measuresnotonlythecostofland(rent),butalsothelandowner'snonlandfarmingcost.[8]Therentalpercentagechargedbythelandownerwillaccordinglybehigher,withanupwardshiftof
rbythesamepercentageateverypoint.Theimplicationofthisisimportant:itdoesnotmatterwhetherthelandownerrequiredthetenanttoinvestmoreinlandandchargesalowerrentalpercentageorwhetherthelandownerinvestsinlandhimselfandchargesthetenantahigherrentalpercentage;theinvestmentwillbemadeifitleadstoahigherrentalannuity.[9]Itfollowsthatforanycontractthetenantdoesnothavetopossesstherequiredamountofinput.Ifwhathehasisinsufficient,thetenantmayraisethefarminginputsbycooperatingwiththelandowner,bysubleasing,byhiringfarmhands,byborrowing,orbyjointtenancywithanotherfamily.Moreover,thedifferenttenantinputrequirementsinfarmsofdifferentlandgradesandproductionfunctionswillmatchtenantswithdifferentinputendowmentsaccordingly.